___________

Kalingatimes reports that Posco is definitely interested in the Orissa project.
Excerpts of the Article below

… The latest statement from the authorities of POSCO-India makes it clear that they were here to stay – to pursue their 12 million tonne per annum capacity steel mill project in Jagatsinghpur district.

…, the company has said in a statement that it was `confident, determined and committed’ to make its Orissa steel project happen. …

But the company has said that as per its human resource plan, overseas staff deployment in POSCO-India project was purely need based.

“Staff deployment is in relation to specific assignments and the employee moves with the changes in assignment. Accordingly, when the construction phase begins, there would be reallocation of staff from overseas in large number,” a statement from the company said.

Although there had been undue delay in the implementation of the project due to non-acquisition of land for the proposed steel plant, the company has announced it was hopeful of starting ground leveling work by December this year.

“The company is further encouraged by the support extended by Government of Orissa as well as Government of India for expediting the project,’ the statement said.

“Going by the recent developments, the company is happy to note that there is a greater understanding and wider consensus in favor of the project building up at all levels, notably among people in the project site.” …

If official sources are to be believed, … POSCO authorities were ready to wait for several more years to implement the project.

“The main worry of POSCO-India authorities would be over the day they were granted prospecting licence for the Khandadhar iron ore mines by the Central government.

As regards the people’s opposition to displacement by the proposed steel plant in Jagatsinghpur as well as the move to grant of prospecting licence to the company for Khandadhar mines, sources said that POSCO was used to such resistance.

“They are hopeful that things will slowly start changing and the opposition will lose strength in due course,” a senior government official observed.

Rehabilitation process begins

Meanwhile, the company, in association with the district administration, has started the process for rehabilitating 48 families that had left Patna village under Dhinkia panchayat of Jagatsinghpur following their differences with those who were against the setting up of the steel plant in their locality.

The company was hopeful that a transit camp for the 48 families would come up within four weeks. Simultaneously, efforts were being made to select a site for constructing a full-fledged rehabilitation colony for these families.

A company official said that once the habilitation colony was set up it would attract people from the camp that was opposed to the project.

The families which had come out of their villages on their own and were supporting the project would be given rehabilitation benefits under the provisions of the existing Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy of the State.

Going by the company’s stand, it appears clear that they might start thinking in terms of packing their bags only if the both the Central Government and the State Government expressed their unwillingness to extend help. But going by the eagerness on the part of both the governments to help POSCO-India, such a situation was unlikely to emerge in the next few years. After all, POSCO-India’s steel project still continues to carry the tag of biggest ever foreign direct investment in the country.

This sounds like a good reinforcement of it’s commitment to the Orissa project.

Market watch reports that POSCO expects to complete land acquisition by year end for it’s Orissa steel plant. Following is an excerpt.

‘Lee also said Posco expects to be able to secure all necessary land for its planned 12 million ton-a-year plant in Orissa, India, by the end of 2007, with construction projected to start in the first half of next year.
Posco is set to invest $12 billion to complete the plant by 2016. Orissa’s state government has so far allocated 1,135 acres of land to Posco, which has requested 4,000 acres. ‘

Other news to be seen is that it has had massive profits due to improved cost-savings from FINEX technology.

Following are some tables from the May 1-15th issue of Pratisruti Plus. The Government of Orissa Steel and Mines department website on MOUs also lists the current MOUs, but does not tell there exact up-to-date status.

Following are some tables from Pratisruti Plus May 1-15th issue.

Following is from Samaja epaper. It gives the reaction of Orissa on the mining policy recommended by the GOM.

Livemint reports the view of miner’s on the iron ore export duty levied by many states. Following are excerpts of that report.

Miners on 8 July demanded the duty on iron ore exports be rolled back, saying it could result in revenue loss of Rs4,554 crore if exports slumped by 30%.
“Iron ore export duty has since been reduced to Rs50 a tonne on fines of 62% and below only. In this context, we feel export duty has achieved none of its objectives,” …

… said there could be a revenue loss of Rs4,554 crore in case of a 30% reduction in exports and a loss of Rs2,642 crore in case exports dipped 20%.

“We also feel imposition of export duty will roll back and throttle all initiatives taken by the mining industry. In fact, ore exporters are losing between Rs200 to Rs300 a tonne owing to rupee appreciation,” …

… argued that the current system of computing the mineral royalty ad valorem is unreasonable. He sought its abolition and suggested the government instead introduce a ‘fixed price’ method to calculate royalty.

Besides the royalty, mineral-rich states have imposed an additional burden on mining industry by levying land tax and peripheral development tax, Sahni said and pointed out that the Jharkhand government has levied land tax at 5% of the commercial value whereas Orissa government has asked the miners to pay 5% of their annual profits for the peripheral development fund.

Similarly the Rajasthan government also has levied mineral-wise land tax at rates varying from Rs10 to Rs100 per sq m, Sharma said. “We feel prima facie, such taxes are not legally in line with the provisions of MMDR Act and may deserve reconsideration,” he pointed out.

Low spending on exploration, delays in clearing applications and difference in fiscal policies pursued by the Centre and states were key impediments to foreign investment in the mining sector. Baldota said the government would have to expeditiously clear applications for prospecting licences and reconnaissance permits.
“The emphasis should be to increase the mineral production rather than enhancing the rates of royalty as being advocated by the states. While computing royalty on ad valorem basis, states add 20% of benchmarked value in royalty to be paid by the miners,” Sahni said.

“This practice is not reasonable and has no basis,” he said. “FIMI would like to request the Mines Ministry for deletion of 20% of the benchmark value in the royalty payable by the mine owners,” he said.

Baldota said no mining lease should be granted without first granting prospecting licence and ensuring prospecting operations within the granted area are duly carried out.

The FIMI is of the opinion that leases which are due for renewal and have total surface area of up to 50 hectares should not attract the provision of public hearing that environmental clearance should not be insisted upon for prospecting licence as the forest degradation at this stage is nil or minimal, he added.

The miner’s demands as stated above is completely against the interest of states.

The economic times reports that the new mineral policy has been announced. Excerpts are mentioned in another post. Here, we list it’s salient features.

• The GoM has accepted the views of the mining industry while recommending no changes in the guidelines for exports.[This decision supports POSCO’s case for captive mines]
• More powers provided to state government. The state governments will be able to give preference to companies undertaking value addition within the state while allotting iron ore mines. This will reduce standalone mines.
• The policy will provide captive mines to all steel units in operation up to July 2006.[I’m not sure about it’s implications for POSCO]
• The policy will now aim towards procedural simplification for attracting investments in the sector.
• It will also benefit the states as under the new policy, the present system of specific rate royalty will shift to ad valorem rate of 7.5%.[This will have great benefits for Orissa and other mineral rich states]. Once notified, the proposal will increase royalty earnings by almost six times.
• The states sitting over mining applications of companies will be penalised as delays will transfer their powers to the Centre.
• Another important aspect of the new policy is that a process of competitive bidding can be initiated for allocation of captive coal blocks. This is presently done by a screening committee within the coal ministry. The bidding process will also be started for all other major minerals.
• Besides, the government will auction mining areas where full prospecting has to be done.
• Companies will have to earmark 3% of turnover for undertaking rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced people under a sustainable development model. However, the ministry of environment and forests will work out fresh guidelines separately to introduce environment-friendly mining practices in the industry.

The economic times states that mining areas will be auctioned for prospecting but the Telegraph says that Auctions mean global giants such as Posco and ArcelorMittal will not be allowed to negotiate for leases with Jharkhand and Orissa on the basis of plans for units in these states. Of course, this statement is speculative. But the states need to be careful before agreeing to this proposal.

Perhaps, We will have to wait and watch for the final notification on the policy.

Following are excerpts from the Economic Times report on this:

A GROUP of ministers (GoM) on Friday cleared the National Mineral Policy that retains the freedom of mining companies to export iron ore without restrictions on quantity or quality. …

The decision also clears the cloud over Posco’s proposed steel project in Orissa that has proposed to export some portion of ore from its captive mines. The company has proposed the exports to enable it to import high-grade ore required for mixing.

However, in order to facilitate value addition within the country and boost steel production, the new policy has given more powers to the state. The state governments will be able to give preference to companies undertaking value addition within the state while allotting iron ore mines. This will mean standalone mining activities will be disincentivised. However, the entire country will be treated as one economic region and states will have to permit transfer of ore outside the state if no one is willing to put up a plant there.

Moreover, the GoM has decided that a balanced policy will be followed while granting captive iron ore mines to steel companies. The policy will, therefore, provide captive mines to all steel units in operation up to July 2006 . It will also benefit the states as under the new policy, the present system of specific rate royalty will shift to ad valorem rate of 7.5%. Once notified, the proposal will increase royalty earnings by almost six times. For example, royalty earnings from iron ore of five ore producing states work out to Rs 250 crore. This will increase to Rs 1,250 crore under the new regime.

However, the new policy will also clip some of the powers of the states. The states sitting over mining applications of companies will be penalised as delays will transfer their powers to the Centre.

Another important aspect of the new policy is that a process of competitive bidding can be initiated for allocation of captive coal blocks. This is presently done by a screening committee within the coal ministry. The bidding process will also be started for all other major minerals.

Besides, the government will auction mining areas where full prospecting has to be done. This will require amendments to the Mines and Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, that is likely to be introduced during the monsoon session of Parliament.

Under the new policy, companies will have to earmark 3% of turnover for undertaking rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced people under a sustainable development model. However, the ministry of environment and forests will work out fresh guidelines separately to introduce environment-friendly mining practices in the industry.

Livemint reports that Paradip port has floated tenders for coal and iron ore berths. Following are some excerpts:

Paradip port plans to build a Rs387 crore 10mt capacity berth for handling imported coking coal used for firing steel plants and another Rs505 crore 10mt capacity berth for handling iron ore export from India. When fully operational, the two berths will have deep drafts of 16 metres capable of handling ships of 125,000 tonnes initially and later 185,000 tonnes. …

Paradip port currently operates a 4mt capacity iron ore berth that handled 6.5mt of iron ore in the 12 months to March 2007. “Customers who take coal through Paradip port are allotted only 10mt by the coal ministry. Unless, we are given more, we cannot handle more,” says Raghuramaiah. The coal linkages for each customer are allocated by the coal ministry. Coal is shipped from Paradip to Ennore and Tuticorin ports for customers such as Tam.

Financial express carried a short interview of POSCO India Chairman and MD with journalist Dilip Bisoi. This interview gives a good idea of the status of the POSCO India project. Following are some excerpts:

• How you are going to accelerate the project’s implementation? We have chalked out a strategy to implement the project. We are preparing to start the ground preparation work by October 2007. Out of the 4,004 acre of land, 3,566 acre is government land and 438 acre is private land. Out of the private land, only 30 acre is fertile land as it yields double crops. We are willing to exclude the 30-acre fertile land from the project site. We are also willing to differ use of the 438 acre private land until the villagers were willing to sell.
• Anti-Posco activists have set up checkpoints and are not allowing anybody to enter the site. How do you plan to enter the area and start work? It is not true that we don’t have access to the site. We do have some access to the site. Villagers in Gadakujanga grampanchayat are supporting the project, while people in Nuagoan area are starting to change their mind in favour of the project. Only a small area of Dhinkia grampanchayat is not accessible. We will shed that portion from the project site for the time being. Access to the site and starting civil work will not be difficult.
• Have you prepared your R&R package?  We are preparing a special R&R package for the displaced people. The Xavier Institute of Management, Bhubaneswar, has been engaged in conducting a survey to understand the needs of the people. The package will be announced once it gets the approval of the Rehabilitation & Peripheral Development Authority. I promise, I will make their lives better than before. Rehabilitating 450 displaced families is not a big job. We want to provide them with a sustainable livelihood.
• How confident you are that the project work will start by October 2007? The next two to three months are very crucial. The prospecting licence for the Khandahar iron ore mines and forest clearance for the project site are expected in the next few months. Once these issues are settled, we will go ahead with the land preparation. If everything goes according to plan, we will procure equipment for the steel plant by the second half of next year. We will shop in the Indian market before going to Asian countries like China and Vietnam. The main plant, however, will be imported from Posco in South Korea. However, starting of the peripheral work at the site by October is very essential.

Economic Times reports  road development related to POSCO’s proposed operations. Following are excerpts from that report.

… the government has decided to develop 600 km of highways, to be called Posco roads, to provide connectivity for the 12 million-tonne capacity steel plant in Orissa. The Rs 4,000-crore highway would be constructed on built-operate-transfer (BOT) model and would be completed by 2010. 

The projects are part of phase-III of the National Highways Development Programme (NHDP). The Posco package consists of seven road stretches, including Panikholi-Keonjhar-Rimoli on national highway (NH)-215 and Chandikhole-Duburi on NH-200. The Cuttack-Paradip state road, jointly funded by the Orissa government, Paradip Port Trust and the roads ministry, will also help serve the transport of goods to and from Posco’s steel plant.

“NH-215 and NH-200 will be specifically geared to carry iron-ore traffic,” the official said. “The roads will serve Orissa’s industrial requirements for upcoming projects in the state, but Posco will be the biggest beneficiary,” he added.  …

Apart from road connectivity being provided by the Centre and the state government, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to link Haridaspur and Paradip by railways has been formed by Rail Vikas Nigam (RVNL) in which Posco has 10% equity,” a Posco spokesperson said.  …

Posco-India will also build a captive port at Jatadhari, 10 km from Paradip and a captive power plant with a capacity of 1300 mw.  …

The company will also lay pipelines for industrial water utilisation from Jobra barrage.

Various Interational journals( forbes,Hemscott,Abcmoney,Reuters UK) have reported that BHP Bilton is buying a stake in a mining unit Ashapura Minechem Ltd.The stake will be 51%. This provides a backdoor entry for BHP Bilton into Orissa. Earliar it tried toi bid in Sesa Goa. BUt that stake was taken by Vedanta group.

BHP Billiton Ltd./Plc. (BHP.AX: Quote, Profile , Research) (BLT.L: Quote, Profile , Research), the world’s biggest mining group, is in talks to buy a 51 percent stake in an Indian alumina project, the Business Standard newspaper said on Monday.Indian mining and mineral firm Ashapura Minechem Ltd. (ASHM.BO: Quote, Profile , Research) will hold the remaining 49 percent in the 25-billion-rupee ($614 million) project in the eastern state of Orissa, the paper said, quoting unnamed sources.The two partners will invest 8 billion rupees towards equity and the remaining 17 billion will be raised through debt, it said.The spokesman for Mumbai-based Ashapura could not immediately comment on the report.In May, an official at Ashapura had said it was bidding for a bauxite mining lease in Orissa.

The Business Standard reported quoted Managing Director Chetan Shah as saying that it would take three months for government approval, and the project would be commissioned by next year.

But he declined to identify a likely partner, the paper said.

Ashapura has a tie-up with China’s Qingtongxia Aluminium Group for a 25-billion-rupee alumina refinery project in the western state of Gujarat. Construction work is scheduled to start in November. ($1 = 40.7 rupees)

There are currently no plans for a Aluminium plant at this stage though.

Times of India reports that Arcelor-Mittal has hired M. N. Dastur to prepare the detailed project report of its proposed plant in Patna area of the Keonjhar district. Following are some excerpts of that article.

The world’s largest steelmaker Arcelor-Mittal has roped in M N Dastur and Company (P) Ltd (Dasturco) to prepare the detailed project report (DPR) for its proposed Rs 40,000 crore steel facility in Orissa’s Keonjhar district. …

The Arcelor-Mittal group, which signed an MoU with the state government for a greenfield steel plant in December, 2006, plans to have its DPR in place within the next 12 to 18 months, sources said.

Dasturco, a five-decade old leading engineering consultancy and design company, has well-known expertise in project planning and appraisal, economic evaluation, design and detailed engineering, project management, supervision of construction and erection and et al and this helped the company bag the deal, sources added.

Livemint was mentioning that POSCO is renowned to be socially a very conscious Industrial company. Following are some excerpts:

A mobile health van goes to some villages at least one day a week, young women have trained as beauticians, doctors have flown in from Korea to fix the cleft palates of local children, scholarships for study have been awarded and street lights have been erected.

On an international level, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been a major focus for Posco, the only major steel company listed in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes, which track the performance of leading companies deemed to operate in a socially responsible manner. Its efforts in India coincide with increased attention to the subject.

Perhaps, this could be a pointer for MNCs who want to invest in backward states like Orissa.

Economic Times reports that central government is mulling to share with states the export duty that it levies on export of iron ores. If this happens this will add to the revenue of mineral rich states like Orissa. Following are some excerpts of the above mentioned report.

The Centre may consider sharing a portion of the recently imposed export duty on iron ore with states. The move is aimed at providing additional revenues to mineral-rich states, where royalty rates have remained abysmally low. Resentment expressed by several states over the Centre’s decision to pocket the entire levy on the mineral may also have swayed the Union government.

This year’s Budget has imposed an export duty of Rs 50 per tonne on iron ore fines with less than 62% iron content and Rs 300 for the remaining ore. The Centre expects to collect over Rs 2,000 crore from this duty. Even if half of it is shared, mineral-rich states — including Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Orissa and Karnataka — could get over Rs 1,000 crore. This would be four times the Rs 250 crore that states receive annually as royalty on iron ore.

“Minerals belong to the states and there is no reason why the Centre should levy a duty and pocket all its benefits. The idea behind the duty was to create a deterrence for exports. The Centre should either pass on the entire collection from this duty to states or share a substantial portion with them,” a Planning Commission official said.

At earlier meetings on the subject of iron ore exports, a few states raised the issue of sharing the export duty and changing royalty rates on minerals from the present specific duty to ad valorem duty. In fact, the Hoda committee, which framed the new mineral policy, has also recommended that royalty should shift to ad valorem rates benchmarked against Western Austrian levies, which works out to about 7.5% of the per-tonne price of minerals.

I came across a 1-page note someone from POSCO-India gave me when I was visiting Bhubaneswar in December 2006-Jan 2007. The 1-page note summarizes a study done by NCAER. The study has also been reported in News media such as Hindu Businessline. (POSCO-India in its web page has additional links.) We will give some excerpts from the Hindu Businessline report.

The 1-page note: POSCO-India’s rs 52,810 Cr investment by 2016 will stimulate Orissa Economy.

• Economic Benefit:
  • Generate Rs 29,760 crores additional annual gross output for Orissa including Rs 12,610 Crore of POSCO-India’s direct gross output.
  • Create excess annual value addition of Rs. 12,100 crores for Orissa which equals 19% of Orissa’s state GDP in 2005-06 (equals 11.5% in 2016-17)
• Employment:
  • Job creation of 870,000 man years, absorbs 88% of state unemployment backlog (i.e., decrease in backlog of employment from 9.9 lakhs in 2005-06 to 1.2 lakhs).
  • 18,000 man years of direct employment in POSCO-India.
• Tax Contribution:
  • POSCO-India annual tax contribution (Rs 2,620 Crores) would be appx. 17.6% of total tax revenue of Govt. of Orissa in 2016-17.
  • POSCO-India SEZ would contribute Rs 174,970 crore tax revenue in next 35 years.
    • Rs 77,870 crores would be to Govt. of Orissa and Rs 97,100 crores to Govt. of India.
    • The differences of tax between SEZ and DTA status is less than 8% for Govt. of Orissa and 5% for Govt. of India.
• Comparison with current Orissa Economy:
  • Orissa in 2003-04:
    • Gross Output: 111,378 crores
    • State GDP: 53,830 crores
    • Employment: 143 lakhs (2001 census)
    • Tax: 8170 crores (2005-06)
  • POSCO-India’s impact:
    • Gross Output: 29,760 crores
    • State GDP: 12,100 crores
    • Employment: 8.7 lakhs
    • Tax: 2620 crores

We now give some excerpts from the Hindu Business line article of January 2007 which partly explains how some of the above numbers were calculated. That article was written by R. Venkatesan who works for NCAER, but the article was his personal view.

The NCAER study broadly used the ADB/World Bank methodology on the social cost-benefit with minor adjustments for the local parameters. Econometric models were used to project border prices for the useful life of the project. The project’s impact from the State economy perspective — in terms of the impact on the State GDP (output multiplier effects) and employment opportunities created within the State (employment multiplier effects) was also assessed.

The output multiplier for iron ore was found to be 1.4 compared to 2.36 for steel. In other words, every Rs 1 lakh worth of output in the iron ore sector would result in Rs 1.4 lakh of output (including the Rs 1 lakh output of iron ore) compared to Rs 2.36 lakh for every Rs 1 lakh output of steel. The employment multipliers for iron ore and steel work out to 0.35 and 0.69 man-years respectively. Therefore, in terms of both output and employment, steel has a larger impact.

These multipliers imply that the Posco project would create an additional employment of 50,000 person years annually for the next 30 years vis-à-vis 870,000 person years in the steel project alternative. In terms of value addition, the iron ore and steel project alternatives would contribute 1.3 per cent and 11.5 per cent to Orissa’s State Gross Domestic Product (or SGDP) by 2016-17 respectively.

An important part of the study was the Least Cost Analysis of technology options in the steel-making, the Finex process that Posco purports to bring and the traditional blast-furnace technology. The Average Incremental Economic Cost was used as the yardstick; this was followed by computing the economic IRR (internal rate of return)
to examine whether the project was economically worthwhile from the national economy point of view.

The EIRR for the Orissa project works out to 16.6 per cent for base case and even in the worst case scenario, the EIRR at 13.9 per cent would remain above the hurdle rate of 12 per cent. The economic impact of the project was estimated at $2.5 billion at the test discount rate of 12 per cent.

The significant feature of the study was the estimation of depletion premium or the opportunity cost for depleteable and non-renewable resource iron ore for reasons cited below:

India’s high-grade ore (+ 65 per cent Fe content — Haematite) reserves, proven and probable, amount to only 0.58 billion tonnes. And even if we were to factor in indicative and inferred reserves (probable/feasible), the total reserves (proven and possibly future potential) would be only 0.92 billion tonnes.

India’s medium-grade ore (+62 per cent Fe to 65 per cent Fe — Haematite) reserves, proven and probable, is only 1.3 billion tonnes. Here too, if we factor in indicative and inferred (probable/feasible and pre-feasibility estimated) reserves, the total reserves (proven and possibly future potential) will be only 2.8 billion tonnes.

Policy Implications

Orissa stands to gain significantly if instead of exporting iron ore it processes it to steel within the State, in terms of both employment generation (17 times), and GDP impact (9 times).

India’s high and medium grade iron ore reserves may not last more than 19 years even if exports of these grades are frozen at the current level or if the targets set out in the draft steel policy are to be met. The economic analysis considered the depletion premium for high and medium grade iron ore. This is the opportunity cost to the national economy of using the depletable resource, which is the average incremental cost of depletion premiums computed year-wise.

Any exporter of iron ore of medium and high grades from the State needs to pay a depletion premium of $27 per tonne. Even this would be a sub-optimal policy from the State’s viewpoint if it can process the medium and high grade ore to steel. No such depletion premium has been applied for coking coal as its price did not exhibit any
trend before the recent steep price hike.

For the eastern States seeking to raise the mineral sector’s share in their GDP, it may be a good idea to set up processing facilities. It would not be advisable to allocate iron ore mines through open bids or accept increased royalty payments, even accounting for the depletion premium, compared to the option of processing iron ore to steel. Future cost-competitiveness and logistical advantage imply that iron ore-rich States can compete with existing over-capacities in the US, Europe and Japan even after factoring in the capital charges for new investments.

Export of iron ore needs to be restricted to grades other than medium and high-grade ore categories; for instance, export of beneficiated ore from Goa using inland waterways logistics advantages could be encouraged. Allowing exports of high grade ore would facilitate export of steel from existing over-capacities in the US, Europe and Japan to East Asia at the expense of future steel exports from new Indian steel capacities which are likely to enjoy cost-competitiveness over existing over-capacities elsewhere.

I am not qualified to judge the above analysis. I would appreciate any comments, analysis, criticisms etc. on the above.

Following is a collection of links that I earlier compiled under the heading “Orissa mining and industries.”

• Forcing Orissa and Jharkhand to remain poor
• Ideas for better revenue generation from Orissa’s minreals.
  • Ammending mining laws so as to get a share of profits from companies that mine Orissa’s minerals (“Odisha Mora, Khani Mora” Campaign By Dr. Jatish Mohanty)
    • A blog on this topic
    • Initial news reports: [newindpress:10/23/06],[Hindu:10/24/06]
    • A draft letter to the Prime minister
  • Requiring companies that lease mines to establish plants in Orissa that will use those mined ores. [Current Orissa govt policy]
  • Modifying the mechanism that is used to price iron ore rates. [Current rate for iron ores set by the central govt is often too low and changes ever so little that the mining and steel companies make lots of profit while Orissa gets peanuts.]
• Trying to understand the issue – a work-in-progress document.
• Open letter to the Tata’s (Sept 2, 2006)
  • A response to it by Mr. Dilu Panda (Sept 13, 2006)
  • Exchange with Mr. Dilu Panda during Sept 14-17 2006: He did not quite substantiate his claims. (Oct 22, 2006)
• Preferential grant of mining leases for Iron ore and manganeese: a report from an expert group appointed by the Govt. of India (7MB) (original)
  • Important page numbers: 223
• List of Orissa mining leases upto July 2005
  
• POSCO-Govt of Orissa MOU
• OMC press release on agreement with Vedanta, Oct 19 2004.
• Q & A presented to council of ministers on the agreement with Vedanta, Nov 29 2004.
• A news item on Tata’s mining leases
• A news item from Hindu on iron ore leases (see page 2) (original)
• A news item from Rediff on POSCO
• A news item from NavHindtimes on ore leases
• A news item from Economic Times: Orissa seeks Ad Valorem based royalty on mining.
  • What is Ad Valorem based royalty? What are other kinds of royalty in mining? (local copy)
• A news item from Business standard about Visa Steel and its struggle with Orissa.
• A news item on Jharkhand borrowing Orissa’s policies.
• A research paper on Steel & Orissa in Steelworld.
• Ex-union minister Mr. Srikant Jena’s objections to recent actions of the Orissa government: a debate
  • His letter to the CM
  • August 5-8 exchange of mails: comments and clarifications
  • Aug 16 exchange of mails
• Orissa mining corporation (OMC):
  • Profit-loss during 2001-04
  • Sales during 2001-04
  • 2003-04 Accountant General report on Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC) and its losses (first 21 pages)
• Coal royalty issues
  • Tathya on November 17 2006.

• Hoda committee report, 2006 (summary, pgs1-28 – 2 MB)
• Dang Committee report, 2005 (7 MB)
• Govt. of Orissa Steels & Mines Department
• Orissa Mining Corporation
• Ministry of Mines, India
• Ministry of Steel, India
• National Steel policy 2005
• Ministry of Coal, India
  
• Coal India Limited
• Orissa and Tata Steel
• Tatas: Kalinganagar
• Tatas: Dhamara
• IPICOL projects (money loaned to many metal related companies)
• Orissa Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)
• Orissa public enterprises status
• Orissa Industrial Policy 2001; ammendment
• Steel & Mines MOUS
• Orissa reference annual 2005
• Orissa government policy documents
• Mines and Communities
• Environment protection group, Orissa